New CDC Coronavirus Study Is a Mindblower

By /

CDC chinese wet market covid19

We have all been told that on December 31st of 2019 the Chinese government reported the first outbreak of the novel coronavirus at a Wuhan wet market. You’ve likely seen more pictures of those cute pangolins than you can count. However, a CDC study published this week casts serious doubt on that story. Let’s dive in.

The Wet Market

A Chinese wet market is a place where live animals are kept which are often butchered on-site. While this seems bizarre to modern American and European sensibilities, having been in China many times, there is pride in VERY fresh food. I’ll never forget a business dinner when the waiter brought out some sort of insect cocoons that were writhing and squirming to show us that the kitchen was about to boil them. They soon appeared on the table. Meaning, while most Americans don’t like to think about our food as having once been alive, in China it’s a critical measure of quality.

The narrative that we all have been told about the origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is that in late December, there was a cluster of cases at a wet market in Wuhan and that the next day, the Chinese government shut down that wet market. Those two dates are December 31st of 2019 and New Year’s Day. We were also told that the novel coronavirus jumped from a pangolin to humans at that site. However, what if we had evidence from the US CDC that none of this was likely true?

Request a Regenexx Appointment

The NEW CDC Study

A new paper was released this week by the US CDC. Scientists decided to test thousands of Red Cross blood samples that were mostly collected in mid to late December, long before the Chinese government reported on New Year’s eve about an outbreak in a Wuhan wet market (1). It turns out that 1.2% of those samples collected in the western U.S. tested positive for COVID-19 immune antibodies. So while the Chinese government was claiming that this jumped from a pangdolin to a human at a wet market in mid-December, we already had more than 1% of the population of the western US who had experienced the virus, recovered, produced immune antibodies, and were healthy enough to give a blood donation. Meaning that this virus was likely introduced into the U.S. sometime in the fall.

Realize that our first U.S. COVID-19 case was previously reported to be on January 19th, 2020. Of note, the Red Cross just issued a press release basically accepting the new CDC timeline (2). While it’s possible these findings are due to cross-reactivity with a prior coronavirus, the CDC team used multiple different tests which are in common diagnostic use today.

How About that Pangolin?

None of the animals in the wet market tested positive, which was reported back in March in Live Science (3). The researchers did find that the virus was on the surfaces in the wet market, indicating that it was already spreading from person to person in Wuhan by December.

The upshot? It’s now very likely that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was circulating in the western US in the fall and early winter. That data combined with negative animal tissue tests for the virus forces the conclusion that this virus did not originate at the Wuhan wet market. That leaves one obvious question. Where did it come from?

____________________________

References:

(1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Serologic testing of U.S. blood donations to identify SARS-CoV-2-reactive antibodies:
December 2019-January 2020 . https://tinyurl.com/y6mgh72z Accessed 12/3/20.

(2) The American Red Cross. Study Suggests Possible New COVID-19 Timeline in the U.S. https://www.redcross.org/about-us/news-and-events/press-release/2020/study-suggests-possible-new-covid-19-timeline-in-the-us.html Accessed 12/3/20.

(3) Live Science. The coronavirus didn’t really start at that Wuhan ‘wet market’. https://www.livescience.com/covid-19-did-not-start-at-wuhan-wet-market.html Accessed 12/3/20.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar

This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get health and wellness information from a trusted source.

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “New CDC Coronavirus Study Is a Mindblower

  1. Frank C Romeo

    It came from the weapons research lab in Wuhan.

  2. Russ Delaney

    “Meaning that this virus was likely introduced into the U.S. sometime in the fall.”
    How do we know that? I wonder how far we could go back in time testing blood samples to see when it may have started? Are there any other sources of blood that could be used for that purpose? Didn’t research on the virus start at a University in North Carolina? I believe they then moved the operation to the Wuhan lab? What was the purpose of this research? Is Bio-Weapon research intended to defend US citizens from other hostile governments or might we use them offensively ourselves? Fauci has been involved in Bio-Weapon research for decades. Why did he send millions of dollars in financing to the Wuhan Lab? I believe answers to these questions might help understand when and how the virus showed up. I know that’s a lot of questions but I think they might be connected.

    1. Chris Centeno, MD Post author

      It takes about 3-6 weeks after exposure for the IgG antibodies measured to appear. These people then needed to give blood. In addition, the virus had to spread to 1% of the population. Just a few months ago, most communities were at about a 3% infection rate. Hence, fall is a conservative estimate.

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

CONTACT US

9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021
888-525-3005

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email
TO TOP