Regenexx in the News: Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater

By /

You may have seen some recent news stories about the Regenexx Corporate program. One of my concerns is that these stories don’t depict our company accurately and they mark a new disturbing trend in orthobiologics. Since the media and the university talking heads don’t understand how physicians innovate, they have been unable to set a standard for responsible use of orthobiologics versus irresponsible use. Given that’s an area where Regenexx has always been a leader, let’s dig into that topic.

The Bad Actors in Regenerative Medicine

I’ve been an industry watchdog for the past 5 years or so as regenerative medicine has careened off the cliff of reality into the chasm of fantasy. When former FDA head Scott Gottlieb coined the term “Bad Actors” that was a great moment, in that I had been discussing on this blog for years that the fat stem clinics offering cures for every known disease were a big problem. Since then, things have gotten even crazier as I worked with countless reporters to understand the umbilical cord and amniotic fake stem cell treatment space.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

PRP and Bone Marrow Concentrate

At Regenexx, we use two main orthobiologic staples to help patients. Platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow concentrate. The former is a mix of concentrated platelets and the later is a procedure where the stem cell fraction in bone marrow is isolated and re-injected.

If There are Bad Actors, Who are the Good Actors?

If there are bad actors, then there must be the opposite, good actors. For the use of bone marrow concentrate, one way to try to define that might be, as the press has tried to do, to say that all good actors get FDA approval for their “product” before using it in patients. The problem with this analysis is that bone marrow concentrate is often created by FDA 510K cleared machines and isn’t eligible for FDA approval because it’s minimally manipulated. In fact, it fits squarely under the agency’s own 21 CFR 1271.15(b) same surgical procedure exemption for something they don’t want to regulate. In fact, bone marrow isn’t a tissue that FDA regulates at all. In addition, since it’s autologous (from the same patient), it’s also not eligible for 361 tissue registration, another FDA pathway. In fact, bone marrow isn’t even listed on that form.

So we can’t define a good actor by one that gets FDA approval for the use of bone marrow concentrate, as the FDA doesn’t want to regulate that substance. That’s likely because this is a known orthobiologic with studies on its orthopedic use going back to the 80s. So what else can you use to define a good from a bad actor?

Defining a Good Actor

I recently blogged on the problem of academics and science journalists not understanding physician based innovation, primarily because they’re only used to reporting on new drug discoveries.  In that piece, I defined a good actor as:

  • The substance being used is not classified by FDA as a drug that requires approval but fits squarely into the physician practice of medicine
  • Based on the existing research, the innovation is more likely than not to be safe
  • All consented patients are tracked in a registry that queries patients for outcomes and complications at set time points
  • Research on the procedure is published using the pathways described above
  • Based on the data collected, strict candidacy guidelines for who is and who is not a candidate for the therapy are established

A bad actor looks like:

  • The substance is classified by FDA as a drug that requires clinical trials before use
  • There is poor existing research, so the safety of the therapy is completely unknown
  • No patient results or complications are tracked in any formal way
  • No research is published
  • Everyone is a candidate
Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

Throwing the Baby Out with the Bathwater

Regenexx has published 23 studies on the use of orthobiologics. That’s more than any other single author in the space other than maybe Phillipe Hernigou. We have published one randomized controlled trial and have three more in the works, with two nearing completion. We use bone marrow concentrate, have published the world’s largest orthopedic stem cell safety study, track all patients in a registry, and have strict candidacy guidelines. Of all the physicians out there using orthobiologics, none outside of our network can really make this claim. Some may have begun using a registry, but most don’t. Few have published anything on the procedures or techniques they use. More use candidacy guidelines, but few have any data on which those guidelines are based.

So here’s the rub, if Regenexx isn’t a good actor, then who is? That’s a problem, as it means then that anyone using bone marrow concentrate is a bad actor, as they both can’t get FDA approval on something the agency doesn’t want to regulate and they don’t have all of the safeguards in place that Regenexx has used for more than a decade. That means anyone who is responsibly using bone marrow to treat orthopedic problems is a potential target.

The upshot? There are good and bad actors and Regenexx is a leader in all the things that make a good actor. So while the press is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, we’ll be setting the standard for what a good actor looks like. We’ll also keep pushing for all practices out there to follow the standards we and others have set.

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications. View Profile

If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]

NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

By submitting the form you agree that you’ve read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may use email, phone, or other electronic means to communicate information about Regenexx.

We will provide information to help you decide whether you want to schedule an evaluation with a Regenexx Physician.

Insurance typically covers evaluations and diagnostic testing (if recommended). Most insurance plans currently do not cover Regenexx Procedures.

Category: Uncategorized
Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved.



9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021


*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.