More on Frankencells
As you may recall, I just wrote about the scientific wisdom of considering IPS as a source of therapeutic stem cells when adult stem cell research is much farther along-the conclusion being that moving these artificially programmed cells from the lab to the bedside was ill advised and likely driven far more by business models than any real world clinical need. On the heels of that blog comes this paper today. The authors injected human embryonic stem cells (hESC) side by side with Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (IPS). These injections were into immune deficient mice, so bad things were more likely to happen. The hESC cells developed teratomas (tumors filled with many different types of tissue) 88% of the time, the IPS cells 100% of the time. The IPS cell tumors were also more aggressive. Again, the risk profile of both of these cells types, hESC’s and IPS cells is drastically higher than adult stem cells-which have already been shown in many many animal models not to form tumors. As have I said before, business models should not be driving medicine, which is clearly the case with IPS.
If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]
NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.