Consensus Document on Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Scams

By /

consensus document on amniotic and umbilical cord tissues

There’s an old adage that if you get 10 doctors in a room, you get 10 different opinions. And like all old sayings, there’s a kernel of truth there. Which is why I was surprised that a group of high-powered physicians that I pulled together on the amniotic and umbilical cord scams were all able to quickly agree on a consensus statement. Is it the beginning of the end for the scammers?

What Is a Consensus Document in Medicine?

Getting to consensus means all agreeing on something. Since agreement between physicians is what drives most of our medical care system and the standard of care, universities and organizations will often convene consensus panels of doctors. There are many methods described for how these documents get created.

Request a Regenexx Appointment

What’s the Problem Here?

We have many chiropractors and some physicians who are scamming patients by claiming that amniotic and umbilical cord products contain millions of live stem cells. We also have the companies that manufacture these products that are making the same inaccurate claims. Since what’s really being sold is all dead tissue, this is a classic consumer bait-and-switch fraud. In addition, the scammers often claim that these are safe and effective treatments for just about everything from arthritis to erectile dysfunction.

What Does This New Document Say?

The new consensus document says that there are two studies that have been conducted on amniotic and umbilical cord products that both agree that they are dead cell products that are growth-factor poor. Meaning that they have no live and functional stem cells. It also says that there is no evidence that these products are safe and effective treatments for arthritis or other incurable diseases. This is, of course, the opposite of what’s preached all over the country at hundreds of seminars a day where elderly patients are scammed.

Who Signed the Document?

The document represents a “who’s who” of physicians, scientists, and regulatory experts in the field of regenerative medicine. On the physician side, we have numerous doctors who lecture frequently at major regenerative medicine conferences and have published peer-reviewed studies in this area. As for researchers, we have Cornell, Mayo, Stanford, Emory, and CSU represented. We also have several regulatory experts who also lecture frequently on the topic of orthobiologics.

Why Does This Matter?

For the scammers, this document is not a good thing. Why? There are several fraud cases brewing against chiropractors around the country, and this document will likely be used as exhibit A in that criminal case. It will also be used in countless malpractice cases against the fraudsters when complications happen. Hopefully, it will also be used by state medical and chiropractic boards to discipline the physicians and chiropractors involved in these scams. Finally, I’m hoping it prompts both the FDA and FTC to act both against the medical providers and the companies manufacturing these products and making these claims.

What’s Next for This Document?

That’s up to the signatories. The goal here was to have a small panel that could agree on a statement and then begin to ask other physicians to sign on. Then I would like to see this document circulated to major professional organizations for their buy-in. Finally, perhaps it can serve as a nucleus to be expanded to get to consensus on other issues facing the orthobiologics community.

The upshot? I was impressed by this group at how quickly they were all able to turn this around. This bodes well for the community of doctors working hard to use orthobiologics the right way.

This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get health and wellness information from a trusted source.

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Category: Latest News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “Consensus Document on Amniotic and Umbilical Cord Scams

  1. Sam

    The consensus panel is indeed a galaxy of experts!!! Couldn’t have done better! “Beginning of the end” is indeed triggered! Thanks for being the needed spearhead once again!

    1. Regenexx Team

      Thanks Sam!

  2. Cynthia Mettler

    Do you treat radiation damage from prostate cancer treatment? My husband (74 yrs old) has ED and lower bowel weakness since his radiation treatments (2010). Do you ever offer stem cell IV treatment for things such as Lyme disease? Thank you

    1. Regenexx Team

      Hi Cynthia,
      Sorry, would love to help, but we don’t do either. Our practice and research is exclusively in the field of Regenerative Interventional Orthopedics.

  3. Jonas

    Dear Chris,

    First off, thanks for all the great work you do in the field. I started reading your blogs a while ago. I was Wondering if the attitude you and some other experts have towards umbilical cord cells is your general attitude on them or mainly referring to clinics/physicians and cells manufactured in the us? I’m really perplexed given I have read a lot of encouraging things about umbilical cord cells (mainly from people that seem rather serious).
    On that note I would also be very interested in what your opinion on exosomes is.

    Thanks you very much in advance!

    1. Chris Centeno, MD Post author

      The amniotic and umbilical cord products manufactured in the US that we and others have tested have no live stem cells. Outside the US, there are clinics that can isolate and culture expand stem cells from fresh birth tissues. On exosomes, see This is an illegal drug product in the US with no clinical data that it helps orthopedic conditions.

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet


Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar


Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog


9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021


Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.