COVID-19 UPDATE: Regenexx is committed to the health and safety of our patients. You may now be seen in clinic or via telemedicine for virtual/online or phone visits.
LEARN MORE
Our physicians are available via telemedicine to continue to give you the care you need during this difficult time. Learn more.

My PRP Injection RCT Infographic: Google Screwed Up

By /

As you might recall, Google made the decision this year to restrict medical clinic advertising for PRP (platelet rich plasma). However, was that a move based on the scientific literature or just bad advice? After spending days distilling all of the PRP RCTs down to a single diagram, it’s clear that Google got bad advice. Let’s dig in.

Google PRP Ad Ban

The bench scientist crowd working with universities to commercialize expensive orthopedic cell-based products is afraid of PRP. Why? It’s dirt cheap compared to the products their universities are trying to push through the regulatory gantlet. If these products can’t beat PRP, their commercial prospects are toast, as why would United Healthcare pay 20-40X more for an expensive cell-based product when it can’t beat a cheap autologous product? Hence, it wasn’t a big surprise to me that Google’s recent stem cell advertising ban threw the PRP baby out with the fake stem cell bathwater. Why? They got their advice from university bench scientists.

Let’s Do What the Bench Scientists Didn’t Do-Look at the Science

I ran multiple searches on PubMed for PRP injections and various orthopedic diseases looking for randomized controlled trials. I found 66 RCTs covering 12 different orthopedic conditions. 60 of those showed that PRP was effective, was non-inferior to, or better than the comparison group. The conclusion? Despite heterogeneity in what was considered PRP, there is no orthopedic surgery currently covered by insurance and performed at every major university that is as well researched as PRP. That’s why all of the medical schools where the Google bench scientist advisors work inject PRP.

How to Use The Infographic

I created the above infographic so that someone who didn’t know this literature (like the bench scientists or Google) can quickly see what’s published. First, click on the image above to get a higher quality PDF (or here). Each circle represents a different study. The blue circles represent studies where PRP was effective and the red where it was ineffective. The clinical indications or body areas treated are listed on the y-axis to the left. The sub-titles are the treatments PRP was tested against. If you click on the text in a circle it links to the Pubmed listing.

Time for Bench Scientists to Eat Some Humble Pie

You guys know who you are. You need to admit that your position on PRP was not scientifically accurate. How bad was this advice to Google? All of these surgical procedures performed at all of your medical schools have far less RCT back up than PRP:

  1. Lumbar fusion
  2. Spinal decompression for stenosis
  3. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy
  4. Shoulder rotator cuff repair-all types and all tear sizes
  5. ACL reconstruction
  6. Ankle fusion (triple arthrodesis)
  7. Knee arthroplasty
  8. Shoulder arthroplasty
  9. Knee microfracture
  10. Discectomy

I could go on…

If You Want to Use the Infographic

This new slide is definitely going into the talks I give, including one coming up at the annual A4M conference in Vegas. If you want to use the slide in a talk or presentation, then please ping me at [email protected] for permission. You must give the author credit and the slide must be presented “as is”. In addition, the slide can’t be used for commercial purposes to sell anything, but only for scientific or educational purposes.

The upshot? Google made a bad non-science based decision here. It needs to reverse its policy. Finally, their bench scientist advisors who have dedicated their lives to science need to actually live by that credo by admitting they didn’t actually read these 66 studies.

Get health and wellness information from a trusted source.

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 thoughts on “My PRP Injection RCT Infographic: Google Screwed Up

  1. Dirk De Schaepmeester

    Great job you did !
    Congratulations

  2. Dr. Edilson Silva Machado

    Very usefull
    Excellent job Dr Centeno.
    Congrats

  3. JUNE HUCHINGSON

    I’M DISGUSTED WITH SOCIAL MEDIA AND THE OVERALL CENSORING THEY ARE DOING.
    SOMETHING IS VERY WRONG IN OUR COUNTRY. SOMETHING IS ALSO VERY WRONG WITH MEDICINE IN OUR COUNTRY.

    I GUESS WE WILL HAVE TO “FIGHT” THEIR (GOOGLE’S) AGENDA.

    IN MY EYES, DR CENTENO IS A HERO (AS WELL AS A PIONEER.)
    I WILL TRY TO SPREAD THE WORD BEST I CAN.

  4. Teresa M.

    Dr. Centeno,

    I greatly appreciate the infographics you compile. The easy-to-comprehend blue vs red, organization by body part, and clickable link to each publication make this an extremely user-friendly way to convey a vast amount of information, to both lay-people and scientists.

    I have linked your stem cell Infographic blog on Facebook groups, emailed blog articles to friends, and printed information from the website for my healthcare providers. It really shuts people up when they claim there is no scientific evidence for stem cells / PRP / biologics.

    A minor suggestion would be to include in the infographic that n=66, and 60/66 (90.9%) showed effectiveness/ beat comparison/were equivalent to. It is covered in your blog here, and easy for a presenter to add onto a discussion slide, but including it in the slide, I feel, would strengthen it even further.

    I greatly appreciate all the work you do in this field. Thank you and bravo!

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

CONTACT US

9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021
888-525-3005

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2020. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email