Stem Cell Institute of America Changes Its Tune?

By /

stem cell institute of america

I’ve written several times about Stem Cell Institute of America (SCIA), a chiropractic group that uses mostly mid-level, non-physician providers to perform amniotic and cord blood dead stem cell procedures. In spite of their marketing, behind the scenes, they claim to be nothing more than a marketing group and not a true medical network. A colleague went to their recent seminar and wrote me about what they said. The good news is, they seem to now have changed their tune and are “talking the talk”, now can they “walk the walk”?

An Expose on SCIA

After we discovered that amniotic and cord tissue products currently on the market have no stem cells, I was floored to see a group of chiropractic clinics aggressively marketing these products as “stem cell therapy.” I first blogged on this chiropractic stem cell group a few years back and here’s a video expose based on what they have said and marketed under a number of company names:

Request a Regenexx Appointment

Brent Detelich Steps Down

The chiropractor running this group had been convicted of health care fraud 10 years earlier in an unrelated matter and after the above video aired, we were told by the company that he stepped down as president. Would the company change its ways? Would they change the deceptive bait and switch marketing tactics used by their member clients?

A Colleague Who Attended their Recent Conference

I recently received an email from a medical colleague who decided to attend the SCIA conference. Here’s his take on what they said on stage:

• If you are going to say “stem cells”, the only product that meets the FDA criteria is bone marrow. “If your marketing or ads say stem cells you better be using bone marrow”.
• Of the doctors online in the webinar portion of their presentation (I assume that they could poll easily), 51% said they use amniotic and 30% umbilical. That means that 81% are still using these tissues.
• They said umbilical cord blood does not pass muster for homologous use.
• They cautioned their members not to treat various diseases outside orthopedics or from performing IV “stem cell” therapy.
• They want their clients to get more training.
• They want their members to follow their patients for 12 months and track outcomes.

All of this sounds like it was written by me or plucked from one of my lectures on the wild west of stem cells.

Talking the Talk vs. Walking the Walk

So on the positive side, SCIA appears to be “talking the talk”, meaning they are saying all the right things, at least at their annual conference. However, even as I write this blog, their website still says that they’re using an amniotic product, which it also describes as a cellular therapy. Hence, the mothership has yet to correct the messaging.

The big issue is whether they can actually force the chiropractors advertising under their banner to comply with the law and avoid the bait and switch marketing schemes. That may be easier said than done. Why?

We know in writing that SCIA sees itself as a “consultant,” meaning that while the average consumer would believe SCIA to be a provider network with rules, it’s actually a marketing facade for the practices who are the customers of the consultant. As a result, SCIA takes no responsibility for the treatments provided at the offices that advertise under its banner. Let me explain.

As an example, if you claim to be a licensed physician with board certification in cardiology and Cigna and/or United Healthcare finds out that this isn’t true, they reserve the right to drop you from their provider panel. Or if your license becomes restricted because of a medical board sanction, you may also be exited from the network. Hence, the public knows that there are standards when they see an “in-network”. physician.

How will SCIA enforce the things that it claims are standards when it considers itself merely a consultant? A consultant can recommend anything it wants and the client is free to do what he or she wants. So let’s explore how SCIA could clean up the ethical mess it’s created.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar

Cleaning Up the Mess

The Name

In its various incarnations, SCIA consistently uses the term “stem cell” in its name and throughout its widespread marketing efforts. Having checked in on several of these chiropractic offices, most use amniotic or cord tissue which is regulated to be non-viable (Dead) and of course has no live and functional stem cells. Also, realize that the FDA is a claims made regulatory system. Meaning that simply claiming you’re using stem cells from a third party source would require that the product be FDA approved with years of clinical trials for each indication, which these tissue products don’t have. This still holds true even if the product you’re using has no live stem cells.

In other words, the FDA’s regulations make clear that if an allogeneic product (like amniotic membrane or cord blood) is claimed to rely on the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function, then it cannot be used on human patients without express permission from the FDA. None of these products have that type of FDA approval.

Despite these issues, SCIA’s data collected at its conference from the online crowd shows that more than 80% of their client practices use these tissues and describe it as “stem cell therapy”. We also know from the conference that by the group’s admission these are not “stem cell” therapies, thus calling into serious question why it would continue to refer to itself as a “stem cell” – focused organization.

The Advertising

We have several SCIA client clinics near us and all use the term “stem cell” in the marketing and none, in fact, as detailed above, are injecting live and viable stem cells. Now we also have confirmed that the “consultant” has deemed this sort of advertising as not compliant. Will they change?

Umbilical Cord Blood

The consultant says that umbilical cord blood can’t be legally used to treat orthopedic conditions. Why? First, FDA regulations require that these regulated tissues be used in a patient in the same way the body uses them. The only safe approved use of cord blood is pediatric cancer. And again, if an allogeneic product like cord blood is dependent upon the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function, it cannot be used on human patients without express permission from the FDA. However, SCIA has numerous client clinics that use it to treat knees, shoulders, hips, etc., so if SCIA is serious about FDA compliance, all of its clinics would have to abandon this practice.

IV Therapy

Most package inserts I have seen that come with amniotic and cord blood products state that they are not for intravenous use. Why? At the end of the day, while an IV is a simple thing to do in a clinic, it’s a very risky route of therapy for any investigational substance. For example, you can’t control where the injection is going and thus if it will have an impact on many body systems. While amniotic tissue has been used in surgery and cord blood has been used for pediatric cancers, there is no safety data for IV use.


Almost all SCIA client clinics that I have seen use mid-level providers (nurse practitioners and physician’s assistants) instead of highly trained physician specialists. Why? This is the best way to minimize cost to the clinic and maximize profit. If SCIA wants to change to using bone marrow (which they seem to be hinting at), as I have previously written, a bone marrow aspirate is generally considered beyond the scope of practice for a mid-level provider. While this type of procedure may be performed by a mid-level in an oncology practice in a hospital setting with physician specialist supervision, we’re talking about a chiro office here. Hence, if SCIA is going to fix its training problem it needs to hire many physician specialists and get rid of the mid-levels. Will this happen?

Tracking Outcomes

We have collected more registry data on orthopedic stem cell treatment outcomes than any other group on earth. In fact, there is no close second. SCIA says it wants its clients to begin tracking outcomes. This is easier said than done.

We have spent millions of dollars over 13 years collecting data. It’s a very big job that requires not only specialized software and real people who bother patients to get the needed information, it also requires a tremendous commitment of each office, whose staff needs to make sure they submit all of the data on each patient. Can SCIA require its consulting clients to collect data? For example, if a Regenexx network provider clinic refuses to collect data then it can be removed from the network. How will SCIA deal with clinics who don’t want to make this commitment?

The upshot? Will SCIA clean up its act? Can it? Will it begin exiting client clinics that don’t follow the rules or will it focus on maximizing profit as a consultant? Will it “walk the walk” or just “talk the talk”?

This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

12 thoughts on “Stem Cell Institute of America Changes Its Tune?

  1. Marie Frisch-koehler

    Are you doing anything for stroke recovery
    Marie koehler
    [email protected]
    Thank you

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      Our focus is solely orthopedics.

  2. Jeremy Dunbarr

    It is not beyond the scope of practice for mid-levels to perform bone marrow aspirate or lipo aspirate procedures if they are trained. If effectively trained to perform procedures, they are no less qualified than the many primary care physicians that are getting into this field strictly for monetary reasons. We utilize mid-levels in our practice, and they are very competent and effective at delivering great health care with excellent patient satisfaction.

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      Jeremy, a mid-level performing a surgical procedure in a chiropractic office without direct physician supervision where the nearest help is 911, is ridiculously irresponsible medicine.

  3. Vicki Shoap

    There is a chiropractor in our area that advertises regenerative cell therapy to alleviate knee arthritis. Patient remarks call it stem cell therapy but his ad clearly does not say stem cells. Secondhand information about a local person who had this procedure says he was able to throw away his cane and feels better than ever……he is a person in his late 70’s, early 80’s. How can this be? The proof is in the results……..what “healing” could have taken place with a dead stem cell product?

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      These products contain growth factors like a platelet-rich plasma shot. Hence they can, in the right patients, help pain. However, they have no living stem cells. In addition, they are wildly over priced because a simple joint PRP injection runs about 1K.

  4. Kathleen Bredberg

    I had this done in a chiropractic clinic in Phoenix (Chandler) Arizona. They used “amniotic stem cells from placentas” produced by a company here in Phoenix. They said they only use material donated by new mothers. I had it done at Tru Health Medical in Chandler but I don’t think it has made any difference and I spent over $5K. Should I go back and insist on a new scan to see if there has been any improvement? Also, Tru Health said the person doing it was a doctor from Nigeria but he just be a nurse practicioner.

    Link to their site:

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      Kathleen, there are no living and viable stem cells in the injection you received. Hence, if they told you that there were stem cells, you got scammed.

  5. John Remza

    Thanks, very helpful briefing. Any clinical studies in your clinic this Spring. Looking forward
    to your next topic.

    1. Regenexx Team

      John Rezza,
      We continue to recruit for the ACL and Rotator Cuff Clinical Studies, and the CCJ Instability Alar Transverse study will be recruiting soon. Please see:

  6. Ron Goddard

    Question; Can you repair spinal problems? I had an operation on my spine 5 yrs ago to repair bulging discs, now it is beginning to hurt. I cannot sleep in a bed, I can only sleep in a recliner chair, I am 78 yrs. old. Can you help?

    1. Regenexx Team


      We treat patients who have had prior spinal surgery regularly, so likely, but we’d need more information. To see if you’d be a Candidate, please submit the Candidate form to the right of the Blog.

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet


Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar


Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog


9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021


Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.