Jeff Hayes and “The Healing Miracle: The Truth About Stem Cells” (aka Stem Cell Docu Series)

By Chris Centeno, MD /

Receive a Regenexx® Patient Info Packet by email and learn why it's a superior regenerative solution.

the healing miracle film

You might have wondered why in yesterday’s blog I would be so concerned about chiropractors, naturopaths, and acupuncturists entering into the field of stem cell therapy. After all, if you read this blog, you know that I’m a huge fan of chiropractors, naturopaths, acupuncturists, and other alternative-health practitioners. I’ve even called out my own profession as ignorant because of new research showing that certain alternative therapies have a real basis for working and new research showing efficacy. So what evidence do I have that alternative-health practitioners in orthopedic stem cell therapy will damage the field? Look no further than the ad for an upcoming documentary by Jeff Hayes entitled, “The Healing Miracle: The Truth About Stem Cells.” This is also being advertised as the “Stem Cell Docu Series”. Let me explain.

I Love Alternative-Health Practitioners

There are days when I see how my own medical profession can be the worst type of proverbial bull in the china shop of the body. It’s on these days that I can’t stand my colleagues. When I see how a long spinal fusion has permanently ruined a life. When I observe botched joint replacements or patients on their 10th knee surgery, I’m incensed. On the other hand, living in Boulder, Colorado, the alternative-health capital of the earth, I get to see some crazy stuff, but I also see patients who aren’t maimed and who are generally happy with their results.

Having said that, I also realize that some alternative practitioners live in an alternate universe of hyperbole. As an example, I will never forget spending time with a chiropractor in a mini-externship when I was a resident physician. This was an unusual request that freaked out Baylor College of Medicine, so I did it over a couple of vacation days. While I learned much about chiropractic, one thing disturbed me. While we had been taught to never bias a patient result by suggesting anything about whether our therapy was effective, the chiropractor said to every single patient as they got off the adjusting table, “Now tell me how good you feel.” That was when I learned that some alternative-health practitioners viewed patient outcome in a more hyperbolic and subjective fashion. I’ve also since come to understand that this is much less common among younger chiros and more common with older chiros. In fact, chiro colleges have been trying to adopt more and more medical approaches for the last one to two decades.

The Jeff Hayes Film “The Healing Miracle: The Truth About Stem Cells” (aka “Stem Cell Docu Series”)

So why is it that I’m so concerned about alternative-health practitioners entering into orthopedic stem cell therapy? One only need to look as far as the new ad for the film “The Healing Miracle: The Truth About Stem Cells” (also being advertised as the “Stem Cell Docu Series”). We’ve known about this Stem Cell Institute of America (SCIA) sponsored film series since earlier this year when the company took out full-page ads in chiropractic magazines to announce that the film would be “distributed to millions of consumers.” They also claimed that chiropractors needed to join the SCIA network now because the films would generate massive patient interest in SCIA stem cell treatments. To see the ad I’m talking about, see about 1:28 in the video below (this is the investigative video I posted yesterday and not the Jeff Hayes film):

At that time, the Jeff Hayes film looks like it had a different title (“Stem Cells Revealed”) and it was to be released in October of 2017, which came and went.

The Ad for the New Film Is a Prime Example of Why I’m VERY Concerned

As I said yesterday, the single thing keeping stem cells out of everyday clinical use is credibility. That extends from the idea of “street cred” to the more stringent “academic cred.” That credibility increases when physicians publish more data, find out who is and isn’t a candidate for this therapy, and underpromise and overdeliver. In fact, it’s this last part that the ad and film really violates.

One need go no further than the advertising of the film, where the word “miracle” is thrown around frequently. The word “miracle,” while likely fine in how patients describe some therapies, is a huge problem in medicine. All therapies have a success and failure rate, and stem cells are no different. Referring to stem cell treatment as a miracle is irresponsible. Why? Because it’s not a miracle for those patients that don’t respond or who partially respond. It’s also not a miracle for those who have complications. More importantly, suggesting that stem cells are a miracle cure reduces the credibility of the field.

Next up we have this ridiculous image used in the documentary:

the healing miracle review

On the left, we see a patient with moderate to several lateral compartment arthritis with severe valgus deformity. The X-ray film on the right purports to show that cartilage has been restored. Even the deformity (the angle of the knees) has resolved. What’s interesting here is that I have asked every orthopedic stem cell expert I know whether they have ever seen a patient with moderate to severe knee arthritis get complete cartilage restoration or any significant restoration for that matter. Despite my expert panel (which includes myself) never having seen this happen using any number of different technologies (including those used by SCIA), we have the hyperbole above.

So how did this happen in the images above? First, what’s not shown is interesting. We don’t ever see an MRI image, despite there being about 12,000 MRI scanners in the U.S. Why? Second, the image seems to show an increase in joint-space width, but anyone can create or delete the appearance of joint space width simply by changing the angle of the X-ray beam relative to the joint. For example, see my images below where I tilted the beam an imperceptible five degrees and created the false appearance of a bigger joint space in the process:

Finally, the dead-giveaway clue about what happened with these knees is found in the dramatic change in angle of joint. If the knee has loose ligaments, the patient could literally create both images without any change in cartilage simply by standing a different way. Finally, despite the fact that you can’t see cartilage on an X-ray and no MRI is shown (that can see cartilage), the caption of the image states that the cartilage has been restored.

More Irresponsible Statements

How about these humdingers?

“…the cure for what will someday surely kill you is already available, already in…you.

…the “fountain of youth” was REAL?  (ok, not the fountain of youth, but at least a few drops from it….)”

We have no evidence that using your body’s own stem cells or dead amniotic tissue will cure fatal diseases and allow you to live a longer life. This statement is so badly worded that it includes all diseases that could kill us, which is quite a wide list. I’m not even going to comment on the fountain of youth gaffe.

Getting into the Trailer

The lalapalooza of crazy statements not supported by any clinical research or even responsible observation continues. I know a few people in the film and was very concerned to see Neil Riordon say that in tens of thousands of stem cell procedures, there have been no serious adverse events (SAE). While Neil is one of the only “experts” featured in this trailer who has any clinical publications, I can find no safety paper published by Neil that supports that statement. Neil may not understand that the NIH/HHS definition of SAE is any complication that requires significant medical care to remediate it. We’ve actually published the world’s largest safety paper in stem cell therapy with 2,372 patients, and while there were no serious complications related to the therapies we use, there were SAEs.

Regrettably, the vast majority of those quoted in the trailer and claimed to be experts, aren’t experts. Most are chiropractors who have no publications in this area. Given that the definition of “expert” in medicine is someone who has published in the peer-reviewed medical literature or who would be invited to speak on the podium of a medical conference because of his or her experience and expertise, these are what I call “faux insta-experts.” For example, due to lack of actual expertise, none of these “experts” would be invited to speak at an academic orthopedic stem cell conference.

In this “stem cell” documentary, we also continue to see patients treated with amniotic-tissue products, which you’ve now learned don’t have any live and viable stem cells (see the video above). So the bait and switch exposed in the investigative film above continue to happen in the Healing Miracle film.

We also see a blind injection without guidance, a “no-no” if you read this blog (at 1:08), using improper sterile technique (no drapes). In addition, that blind injection is medial patellofemoral, which has a much higher blind miss rate for being in the joint (due to the large medial PF fat pad). Meaning there was a significant chance that this knee injection never made it into the joint. It’s 2017 folks—there is no rationale for not using ultrasound or fluoroscopic guidance in a knee injection.

We also see Kristin Comella, who is with US Stem Cell, where three patients were blinded by stem cell injections into their eyes. She and the company also just received a warning letter from the FDA and were called out by the new FDA commissioner, Scott Gottlieb, as “bad actors” (not in the film sense). Mark Berman is also there, also called out by Gottlieb as a bad actor after his Rancho Mirage office was raided by the FBI for the possession of a smallpox vaccine being used to transfect stem cells used to treat cancer. He also recently received a 483 inspection report from FDA stating that his office was producing a cell drug without FDA approval. Both US Stem Cell and Berman were called out for not meeting drug manufacturing standards.

I also know others in the documentary who are well-meaning patient activists, and my guess is that they had no idea that they were being asked to participate in a sales piece for SCIA. How do I know this is an SCIA-sponsored piece? One bit of evidence is that that’s what it says in the SCIA advertisement. The second is found in an e-mail sent by a colleague who turned down being involved in this film.

The E-mail That Shows This Is an SCIA Ad

A while back I was told by a colleague who is a stem cell expert that he was asked to participate in this film. He turned them down as he had concerns about the e-mail and the film itself. Who sent the e-mail? No other than the president of Stem Cell Institute of America, Brent Detelich (a convicted felon—see video above). Brent was recruiting for people to be in the documentary. Note that while the e-mail was cc’d to Jeff Hayes and a production assistant, it was from Detelich.

The upshot? Now you see why I’m concerned about chiropractors entering this space. Orthopedic stem cell therapy has serious work to do to hit the mainstream, and documentaries like this and advertising like that used by this film and SCIA move that credibility matrix backward and not forward. In addition, this film looks to me to squarely fit into the category of “bad actors” described by the new FDA commissioner. Hence, my concern is that rather than the FDA allowing orthopedic stem cell therapy to find its own way and gain needed street cred with the medical community at large, my opinion is that this film will force the FDA’s hand to get rid of all physician-centered therapies in orthopedics. Basically, the approach will change from allowing orthopedic therapies to continue while targeting the out-of-control miracle-cure clinics offering therapy for every known incurable disease to “throw the baby out with the bathwater.”

Category: Latest News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

8 thoughts on “Jeff Hayes and “The Healing Miracle: The Truth About Stem Cells” (aka Stem Cell Docu Series)

  1. Sam

    This before/after injection bilateral knees x-ray image has been on my nerve for years as it is frequently used by “specialists” (i.e. PMRs, Sport Meds – let alone non-MDs/DOs) to advertise the effectiveness of IA prolotherapy with dextrose in cartilage regeneration and pain management. Here is an example: https://www.caringmedical.com/prolotherapy-research/cartilage-regeneration-knees/ .
    In one case the physician even rules out any knee misalignment or positive anterior drawer / valgus / varus stress tests – concluding the increased joint space is an indication of cartilage regeneration.
    Some physicians have taken this misconception to a higher level by doing IA facet injection with dextrose.

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      Agree 100%! The ONLY way cartilage can be accurately measured is on an MRI.

  2. Jordan

    Quote from above article: ” What’s interesting here is that I have asked every orthopedic stem cell expert I know whether they have ever seen a patient with moderate to severe knee arthritis get complete cartilage restoration or any significant restoration for that matter. ”
    So, confirming that you’re saying that even from a legitimate source, a person with moderate to severe arthritis would not achieve any significant restoration from stem cell treatment? If so, why is that particular treatment advertised?

    1. Chris Centeno Post author

      Yes, patients with severe arthritis with no cartilage should expect NO cartilage regrowth, as that’s not how these procedures work. Please see https://regenexx.com/blog/stem-cells-for-arthritis/

  3. Dan

    @Jordan, I have a very similar question.. By how your blog/response is written, the way I read it is that unless you have slight degeneration of the knee that you are really not a candidate??

    ” What’s interesting here is that I have asked every orthopedic stem cell expert I know whether they have ever seen a patient with moderate to severe knee arthritis get complete cartilage restoration or any significant restoration for that matter. ”

    In this you say moderate to severe.. so ONLY slight is going to be beneficial??

    1. Regenexx Team

      Dan,
      The critical piece of missing information is that the problem is not the lack of cartilage. Millions of knee joints have been amputated and replaced with prostheses for an issue that is not causing the patient’s pain and dysfunction. Please see: https://regenexx.com/blog/osteoarthritis-pain-not-related-to-structure-again/ and https://regenexx.com/blog/why-middle-aged-people-should-ignore-cartilage-loss-and-meniscus-tears/ and https://regenexx.com/blog/knee-nerve-pain/ and https://regenexx.com/blog/stem-cell-cartilage-regeneration/ and https://regenexx.com/blog/knee-replacement-after-stem-cell-treatment/

  4. Denise Brand

    The problem with the above article and comments is it has taken the iew to the opposite extreme – there is no middle ground. What if there was no 100% restoration for stem cells or prolozone thereapy but the pain had significantly reduced and the joint stopped deteriorating and quality of life regained? I am one that had prolozone injections in both knees after 2 operations to scrape the cartliage – how wrong is that for starters, why can’t the stemcells or prolozone promote the body to heal the damage. My knees I couldn’t be happier with, I was at the point where I was being told, the next operation ie. the 3rd is a knee replacement. Since the injections, 5 yrs ago my knees only every now and then give me a little, and I mean a little pain for a day because I have twisted it dancing or something. Also there is no looking at why the degeneration happend in modern medicine and trying to work with that to fix it, if it is obvious like arthritis fine but what if the knees are slightly out of align because of prolapsed feet causing the wrong angles in the knees. Why on earth put orthotics in to compound the problems, why not release the tightness and retrain the foot to work – which I have also had done after being prescribed orthotics. Threw those away, did the work ie. muscle release and strengthening and learning how to use the foot to walk properly. then the injections in the knees and I am 100%. The medical industry is all based around drugs, surgery and crutches – totally irresponsible and corrupt. Find the problem and solve all the smaller problems leading up to the pain, don’t go butcher people. I have my knees and I will keep them and every other piece of myself for as long as I can, and if stem cells have a potential to do that then that is my first line of treatment – not the bloody knife. It should be everyones choice, they need to be given the information so they can investigate and make decisions for themselves. Good on the “Truth About Stem Cells” it is better than the medical patriarchal autocratic approach “Keep you in the dark and feed you BS” little bits of info to support their approach and using fear to control people. All in the name of “protecting the public” Give them all the info – their own stem cells won’t hurt them and should be the first line of consideration before the knife!!!!

    1. Regenexx Team

      Hi Debbie,
      We certainly agree that patient’s own stem cells should be the first line of consideration before the knife – we invented orthopedic stem cell injections, have published 44% of the worlds peer reviewed research on the subject and have done more than 85,350 procedures using the patient’s own stem cells and platelets to date. http://www.regenexx.com

Chris Centeno, MD

Regenexx Founder

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications.
View Profile

Get Blog Updates by Email

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Regenerative procedures are commonly used to treat musculoskelatal trauma, overuse injuries, and degenerative issues, including failed surgeries.
Select Your Problem Area
Shoulder

Shoulder

Many Shoulder and Rotator Cuff injuries are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering shoulder arthroscopy or shoulder replacement, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.

  • Rotator Cuff Tears and Tendinitis
  • Shoulder Instability
  • SLAP Tear / Labral Tears
  • Shoulder Arthritis
  • Other Degenerative Conditions & Overuse Injuries
Learn More
Cervical Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Knee

Knees

Knees are the target of many common sports injuries. Sadly, they are also the target of a number of surgeries that research has frequently shown to be ineffective or minimally effective. Knee arthritis can also be a common cause for aging athletes to abandon the sports and activities they love. Regenerative procedures can be used to treat a wide range of knee injuries and conditions. They can even be used to reduce pain and delay knee replacement for more severe arthritis.

  • Knee Meniscus Tears
  • Knee ACL Tears
  • Knee Instability
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Other Knee Ligaments / Tendons & Overuse Injuries
  • And more
Learn More
Lower Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Hand & Wrist

Hand & Wrist

Hand and wrist injuries and arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and conditions relating to overuse of the thumb, are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Hand and Wrist Arthritis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Trigger Finger
  • Thumb Arthritis (Basal Joint, CMC, Gamer’s Thumb, Texting Thumb)
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More
Elbow

Elbow

Most injuries of the elbow’s tendons and ligaments, as well as arthritis, can be treated non-surgically with regenerative procedures.

  • Golfer’s elbow & Tennis elbow
  • Arthritis
  • Ulnar collateral ligament wear (common in baseball pitchers)
  • And more
Learn More
Hip

Hip

Hip injuries and degenerative conditions become more common with age. Do to the nature of the joint, it’s not quite as easy to injure as a knee, but it can take a beating and pain often develops over time. Whether a hip condition is acute or degenerative, regenerative procedures can help reduce pain and may help heal injured tissue, without the complications of invasive surgical hip procedures.

  • Labral Tear
  • Hip Arthritis
  • Hip Bursitis
  • Hip Sprain, Tendonitis or Inflammation
  • Hip Instability
Learn More
Foot & Ankle

Foot & Ankle

Foot and ankle injuries are common in athletes. These injuries can often benefit from non-surgical regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Ankle Arthritis
  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Ligament sprains or tears
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2019. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.