Dr. Singer Will Teach You How to Become a Stem Cell Millionaire

By Chris Centeno, MD /

Receive a Regenexx® Patient Info Packet by email and learn why it's a superior regenerative solution.

david singer stem cells

You’re a chiropractor whose business is built on $39 adjustments and then someone offers you a proposition. If you add “stem cell injections” you can treat everything from knees to aging and make millions in the process. All you need to do is to take a course and you’ll get everything you need to become a stem cell millionaire. Sounds far fetched? Regrettably, it’s happening every day. Let me explain.

Chiropractic Business Consultants

Physicians take for granted that we can be instantly jacked into insurance and hospital-based networks. Hence, few physician practices fail. Not so for chiropractic practices which have a high failure rate. Hence, business consultants in chiropractic are common.

One of the more popular chiropractic business consultants is David Singer. He usually teaches chiropractors how to pre-sell packages of adjustments, add ancillary services like physical therapy, or add a mid-level practitioner to prescribe hormones. However, many months ago he came on my radar when several of my local chiropractic colleagues reached out about the emails sent by David Singer pushing stem cells.

Becoming a Stem Cell Millionaire

To learn more, I signed up for one of David Singer’s free webinars. Regrettably, I had patients during that time slot, so I missed it. However, I got sent an automated email with marketing collateral for the stem cell program. Let’s just say that I was concerned.

This is from one of the PDFs sent to me:

“Knowing how to handle an audience is a science and an art. You will learn all the mechanics from your introduction to the close at the end. You will learn the secrets to signing up 100% of an audience as well as many simple procedures that have helped doctors to get to $300,000 a month with this material.”

Yikes! Dr. Singer tells you that if you add stem cells to your practice, he can collect up to an extra 3.6 million a year!

This is Painful

I usually have many interesting moments when reading the things that chiropractic stem cell marketing experts write and Dr. Singer’s “Regenerative Cellular Treatment” pamphlet was no different. In this, he discusses the five products he’s selling “for homologous use”. He even provides a reference to what he considers homologous use:

“Homologous – similar in position, structure, and evolutionary origin but not necessarily in function.”

However, that’s not the definition that the FDA uses, which is:

“As defined in 21 CFR 1271.3(c), homologous use means the repair, reconstruction, replacement, or supplementation of a recipient’s cells or tissues with an HCT/P that performs the same basic function or functions in the recipient as in the donor.”

This is a critical concept for the 5 products that Dr. Singer is selling which he calls Relev (amniotic fluid), Reviv (amniotic fluid and membrane), Renyte (Wharton’s Jelly), Restor (Wharton’s Jelly + MSCs), and Recharg (umbilical cord blood). Why? Homologous here in the FDA’s parlance means that these products would never be approved for use in orthopedics without an actual FDA drug approval which these products don’t have. Meaning Wharton’s Jelly from an umbilical cord has little to do with muscles, tendons, and joints.

Regulatory Roulette?

After some research on where Dr. Singer was sourcing his products, I found out that these are the names for products that are actually sold by “New Life Regenerative Medicine”, about an hour from Dr. Singer’s Florida office. Dr. Singer’s materials state that Restor has mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The NewLife website reports that they’re “Medicinal Signaling Cells” (a newer term for MSCs). Why is that significant? That’s a clearly illegal claim.

How can I say that Dr. Singer’s and New Life’s claims are not legal? There have been many Warning Letters issued to companies with quickie 361 tissue registrations such as the one New Life filed which claim to be selling stem cells. Here’s one such letter to another vendor that the FDA issued that accuses it of marketing an unapproved drug product. This is now one of a series of letters that makes it crystal clear that any of these companies that are still selling products that claim to have live stem cells are not compliant. This is the key statement from this most recent letter:

“In addition, your products fail to meet other criteria set forth in 21 CFR 1271.10(a). The umbilical cord blood product, StemL UCB-Plus™, fails to meet 21 CFR 1271.10(a)(4). This product, manufactured from donated umbilical cord blood, is dependent on the metabolic activity of living cells for its primary function and is not for autologous use, allogeneic use in a first-degree or second-degree blood relative, or reproductive use. The umbilical cord product, SternL UCT-Plus™, fails to meet the minimal manipulation criterion set forth in 21 CFR 1271.10(a)(l) and defined for structural tissue in 21 CFR 1271.3(f)(1). The product does not meet this criterion because your processing alters the original relevant characteristics of the umbilical cord related to its utility for reconstruction, repair, or replacement.”

While that’s some dense regulatory speak, here’s what it all means:

  • You claim that you’re selling live cells, which makes your product a drug that requires clinical trials and actual FDA approval-you never did that
  • Your processing of the tissue alters what it was meant to do in the body, hence that’s another reason your product is a drug

What is Restor?

In fact, as I quickly learned, NewLife doesn’t make these products, as they are listed on the FDA TIR query as only a distributor. I called their President/CEO, Viki Mansavage, a 35-year veteran of the tissue banking industry. She discussed that their Restor product is manufactured by a third party. I also asked her why her website claims that there are “medicinal signaling cells” in their products, clearly, a claim that FDA says is not permitted for a 361 registered tissue product. She stated that she is trying to do the right thing and pursue an RMAT designation (a type of FDA approval), but when confronted with the concept that she is not permitted to make a claim that she is selling live cells until the FDA actually approves the results of clinical trials (which her company has not conducted), I got no clear response. Later, to Viki’s credit, New Life changed its website to get rid of the claim that the Restor product has MSCs.

So does Restor have MSCs and are there any tests that would meet ISCT guidelines that show that? No, Viki also admitted that it was very unlikely that this product has many live and functional stem cells. This statement goes in the opposite direction of what David Singers states in his marketing collateral. Let’s dig into Singer’s claims.

Umbilical Cord vs Bone Marrow Stem Cells

I again reviewed David Singer’s brochure entitled”Stem Cell Education”. Here he tells us:

“As we age, and our bodies slow down so do our stem cells…It starts out slow day one, 1 penny, day two, 2 pennies, day three, 4 pennies and so on and so on. By the end of the month its going from $200,000.00 one day $400,000.00 the next day and $800,000.00 the next day to $1,600,000.00 and so on. These cells do the same thing. A cell that has a doubling time of 20 to 24 (young sources cells) hours becomes 1,000,000,000 (that is billion) cells in 30 days. A cell that has a doubling time of 60 hours (someone 65 years of age) becomes 200 cells in 30 days. To help the body grow, fix, replace, and regenerate we need to have young vibrant healthy cells or “Day 1” cells meaning the cells are only one day old (newborn). Day one cells are considered young healthy robust cells that have the power to really make a difference in helping a patient’s body to heal.”

This is the standard chiro song and dance that many patients have bought into, that their cells are just too old and that there are millions of young stem cells in umbilical cord products that once injected, these cells will grow in many billions more in their bodies. Is any of this demonstrably true? Is there any evidence that Restor or any other umbilical cord product on the market has millions of live and viable MSCs that are rapidly growing?

As I have written many times before, there is now quite a bit of research that the amniotic fluid and umbilical cord products that are being sold have no viable and functional mesenchymal stem cells MSCs) (1-3). In addition, this recent test of 5 commonly used umbilical cord products from the CSU Translational Medicine Institute tells the whole story visually. In this CFU-f test (one of the ISCT requirements for determining if you have MSCs (4)), purple dots represent stem cell colonies. White is no stem cells. As you can see, all 5 commercially available products on the left had no viable stem cells, while middle-aged and elderly bone marrow had tons of stem cells. So much for Dr. Singer’s sales pitch. In fact, if it were even a little true and there were ANY fast-growing MSCs with 24 hour doubling times in any of these products, given that this is about a 10-day test, the plates here on the left would be covered in one big mass of purple instead of being sterile white.
old age stem cells

Dr. Singer’s Responses

I sent the following questions to Dr. Singer’s office and called his staff to ensure I had the correct email address:

  1. Is Dr. Singer aware of recent FDA actions in the way of Warning letters and TRG TRIP determinations that claims of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells make a 361 registered tissue an adulterated, misbranded, and unapproved drug product which is illegal to sell, distribute, or advertise?
  2. Dr. Singer’s collateral that I was sent clearly positions the Restor product as containing mesenchymal stem cells…Does Dr. Singer have a comment on that information?
  3. What information that meets ISCT guidelines can Dr. Singer provide me that clearly shows that Restor has live and functional MSCs?
  4. If no such information is available, what is Dr. Singer’s comment to the statement that his collateral is not accurate and is in fact misleading?
  5. Can Dr. Singer provide me information from the FTC or FDA that supports his ability to make claims that he is selling stem cell products?
  6. Can I get Dr. Singer’s publications, textbooks, or other published information that demonstrates that he is an expert in regenerative medicine?

At the time of this writing, I had no response. I will update this post if that changes.

Let’s Review

  1. We have a chiropractic business consultant with no expertise in regenerative medicine (i.e. no publications, book chapters, or anything else that defines expertise in medicine) who claims to be able to make chiropractors stem cell millionaires, with collections of up to 3.6 million a year.
  2. Dr. Singer’s collateral contains obvious errors in its understanding of simple terms like “homologous use”.
  3. His information claims that he is selling a product (Restor) with mesenchymal stem cells. However, this product is actually a brand that is a private relabelling of a different Wharton’s Jelly product. There is no clinical research on the rebranded product.
  4. The CEO of the company that rebrands the private labeled Restor product admits that it’s very unlikely that the product has any live and viable stem cells.
  5. Despite this Dr. Singer claims that it has “day 1 cells” that will rapidly proliferate versus the old and slow-growing cells in your bone marrow. None of the published data supports these claims, in fact, the opposite conclusion is supported.

The upshot? If you ever wondered why chiropractors claiming to deliver patients stem cell products but who are really delivering to them dead umbilical cord tissue are popping up all over the place, look no further than chiropractic business consultants like Dr. Singer. If regulators want to stop this stuff, they need to look at the whole food chain. Here we have a tissue manufacturer who supplies a distributor who is supplying chiropractors with a Wharton’s Jelly product that they claim has so many active cells with 20-24 hour doubling times that these will grow into billions of stem cells in your body. However, even the distributor admits that what she sells is stem cell poor, which fits with the research that shows that none of these products have any live and functional mesenchymal stem cells. You can’t make this stuff up.

_____________________________________________________________

References:

(1) Berger D, Lyons N, Steinmetz, N. In Vitro Evaluation of Injectable, Placental Tissue-Derived Products for Interventional Orthopedics. Interventional Orthopedics Foundation Annual Meeting. Denver, 2015. https://interventionalorthopedics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AmnioProducts-Poster.pdf

(2) Becktell L, Matuska A, Hon S, Delco M, Cole B, Fortier L. Proteomic analysis and cell viability of nine amnion-derived biologics. Orthopedic Research Society Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 2018. https://app.box.com/s/vcx7uw17gupg9ki06i57lno1tbjmzwaf

(3) Panero, A, Hirahara, A., Andersen, W, Rothenberg J, Fierro, F. Are Amniotic Fluid Products Stem Cell Therapies? A Study of Amniotic Fluid Preparations for Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Bone Marrow Comparison. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2019 47(5), 1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519829034

(4) Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D, Deans R, Keating A, Prockop Dj, Horwitz E. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2006;8(4):315-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923606

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

5 thoughts on “Dr. Singer Will Teach You How to Become a Stem Cell Millionaire

  1. Tonya

    Are Dr. Singer’s purported “ stem cell therapies “ labeled “ for research use only,” as well? Are the purported “ therapies” donor and host matched? Is there any known method of sterilization for for these types of tissues that are transplanted into other hosts? According to the FDA/ CDC MMWR September 2018, “ there are no known methods of sterilization for these types of products.” So, what other “surprises” do you suppose come with these unlawfully marketed products? According to a public letter sent to the Florida Department of Health, at least 8 communicable diseases potentially. Appreciate the clarification and Great article, Dr. Centeno!

  2. Irwin Abraham MD

    Dr. Centano,
    I remember talking with you a number of years ago about a mutual patient.

    Currently, I have quite involved with Dr. Lyftogt’s Per-neural Injection Therapy (PIT) for chronically painful nerves, having learned about about eight years ago from him and with a yearly conference since. His paradigm of the paradigm of treating the subcutaneous nerves with D5W on 1/2 -1 ml amounts has been useful for my patients. It has mostly replaced the regular 12.5% dextrose prolotherapy these days, after learning it over 40 years ago.
    I wonder how much you are aware of this great treatment.

    Sincerely, Dr. Abraham.

    1. Chris Centeno, MD Post author

      Yes, Irwin, very aware of Lyftogt!

  3. Lbair

    Most interesting information on New Life Dr. Centeno. A little background, New Life (NL) had a recent change in marketing strategy and re-branded their 4 core products. They also modified their corp. website to represent a more subtle approach when promoting their amniotic as a “stem cell” therapy. However; this is a much different from what they advocate behind to customers and/or thru social media sites via their representatives.

    NL buys their juice from Predictive Biotech out in Utah and sells the identical product under a different name. I know you’ve done an analysis on that group so you clearly understand the dynamic with product content.

    Predictive New Life (New Brand) New Life (Old Brand)
    AmnioCyte Restor New Life MSC
    AmnioCyte Plus Renyte New Life UCT
    PolyCyte Reviv New Life AFT+
    Core Cyte Relev New Life AFT

    From the beginning NL has actively marketed and sold their Restor (NL – MSC) product as being a stem cell treatment with MSC’s. I have some of their former literature and its quite entertaining. Additionally, NL’s surrogates, and designated “centers of excellence” market their products as being “stem cell” therapy and containing millions of live stems in each vial. Another one of NL’s infamous, but unsupported tag lines/claims, is Renyte (NL -UCT) a Wharton’s Jelly product contains “fifty times more hyaluronic acid and growth factors than amniotic fluid”.

    The most intriguing component; on May 22, 2019 there was article in a Wisconsin newspaper about a couple clinics in the Madison with some heat for promoting stem cell therapies for unapproved treatments. The two suppliers mentioned as the source of product by the docs in the article were Predictive and New Life. In the article, NL’s CEO is quoted as stating the company’s products contain a “minute amount of stem cells”. Fast forward to your recent conversation (Oct 2019) with the NL’s CEO, and the admission – it’s very unlikely Restor (NL-MSC) has many live and functional stem cells.

    So, couple of questions arise as a result of the CEO’s recent quotes regarding “stem cells”:
     Has the literature, marketing/promotion and street representation of NL’s products been
    disingenuous up to now?
     Where does this leave NL’s customers who have been led to believe (by NL and their
    surrogates) they’re selling and treating patients with “stem cells” – millions per vial?
     What does this tell the patients who were sold on “stem cell” therapy?

    One thing is proof positive, someone’s BS is being exposed.

  4. Margaret Linton

    I need a little more work on my knee. The Regenexx Doctor in Tulsa moved his practice to Dallas. So I checked out Regeneration Nation seminar last night. They are selling umbilical cord stem cell injections. The doctor Dr. roadhouse is a chiropractor and the doctor that does the injections was an anesthesiologist. Sounds very similar to the article you’ve described .

Chris Centeno, MD

Regenexx Founder

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications.
View Profile

Get Blog Updates by Email

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Regenerative procedures are commonly used to treat musculoskelatal trauma, overuse injuries, and degenerative issues, including failed surgeries.
Select Your Problem Area
Shoulder

Shoulder

Many Shoulder and Rotator Cuff injuries are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering shoulder arthroscopy or shoulder replacement, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.

  • Rotator Cuff Tears and Tendinitis
  • Shoulder Instability
  • SLAP Tear / Labral Tears
  • Shoulder Arthritis
  • Other Degenerative Conditions & Overuse Injuries
Learn More
Cervical Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Knee

Knees

Knees are the target of many common sports injuries. Sadly, they are also the target of a number of surgeries that research has frequently shown to be ineffective or minimally effective. Knee arthritis can also be a common cause for aging athletes to abandon the sports and activities they love. Regenerative procedures can be used to treat a wide range of knee injuries and conditions. They can even be used to reduce pain and delay knee replacement for more severe arthritis.

  • Knee Meniscus Tears
  • Knee ACL Tears
  • Knee Instability
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Other Knee Ligaments / Tendons & Overuse Injuries
  • And more
Learn More
Lower Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Hand & Wrist

Hand & Wrist

Hand and wrist injuries and arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and conditions relating to overuse of the thumb, are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Hand and Wrist Arthritis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Trigger Finger
  • Thumb Arthritis (Basal Joint, CMC, Gamer’s Thumb, Texting Thumb)
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More
Elbow

Elbow

Most injuries of the elbow’s tendons and ligaments, as well as arthritis, can be treated non-surgically with regenerative procedures.

  • Golfer’s elbow & Tennis elbow
  • Arthritis
  • Ulnar collateral ligament wear (common in baseball pitchers)
  • And more
Learn More
Hip

Hip

Hip injuries and degenerative conditions become more common with age. Do to the nature of the joint, it’s not quite as easy to injure as a knee, but it can take a beating and pain often develops over time. Whether a hip condition is acute or degenerative, regenerative procedures can help reduce pain and may help heal injured tissue, without the complications of invasive surgical hip procedures.

  • Labral Tear
  • Hip Arthritis
  • Hip Bursitis
  • Hip Sprain, Tendonitis or Inflammation
  • Hip Instability
Learn More
Foot & Ankle

Foot & Ankle

Foot and ankle injuries are common in athletes. These injuries can often benefit from non-surgical regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Ankle Arthritis
  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Ligament sprains or tears
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2019. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email