2017 Orthopedic Bone Marrow Stem Cell Research Infographic

By /

Every year for the last four to five or so, I have compiled a list of the published bone marrow stem cell research. Since I’ve updated this every spring, here’s my 2017 edition. Overall, 2016–2017 has been a mixed year for bone marrow stem cell publications. The good news is that we’ve seen higher quality, but still small studies being published. The bad news is that total publishing volume is down. I suspect this is because we see more diversity in stem cell types being used. This development is likely a good thing.

The Summary of What Got Published

The good news is that we see more high-quality research being published for knee osteoarthritis (OA). Meaning, there are more randomized controlled trials, or control groups. On the other hand, the total number of patients in these studies are still small at 25–50 patients.

The total number of patients {cumulative patient n) is now up to more than 8,500 people. So the next time someone tries to tell you that we have little research on bone marrow stem cell use in orthopedics, just quote that number. While some would claim that clinical research in orthopedic stem cell use is in its infancy, this body of evidence is reaching late adolescence.

What’s fascinating is that some key trends are emerging that aren’t good for the U.S. Outside of our Regenexx studies and a few small ones out of US universities, Spain has been dominating culture-expanded bone marrow stem cell research in orthopedics. This trend is due in large part to regulatory differences between Spain and the U.S. In essence, our US regulatory structure has hamstrung American orthopedic stem cell publishing. Even more bizarre is that despite outspending countries like Spain 100–1,000 to 1 in basic-science stem cell research, we’re somehow falling behind in the clinical-research arena.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

The Need to Start Including Other Cell Types in My Summary

What I found exciting this last two years is seeing the growth in the use of other stem cell types in orthopedics. In particular, the use of stem cells derived from fat has been a part of more studies. While last year there wasn’t enough to include to make a go of it, this past two years, there is enough to warrant inclusion. As a result, tomorrow I’ll post an updated infographic that has all cell types listed.

The Percentage of Total Patients That Are Regenexx

Every year I perform a calculation of the total number of patients that we have published on versus the total published. This is a rough metric of our publishing activity versus the rest of the world. I’m proud to report that 49.5% of the total n (patient number) as of April 2017 are Regenexx patients.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.

How to Use This Infographic

The image above links to a live PDF. Each circle represents a different study and has a live link to that publication. Inside the circle, it lists the first author, the body part treated, the number of patients treated in the study, and the type of cells used. There is also a syringe icon if the study was injection based, a scalpel if the study was surgical, and both if both implant routes were used.

While I try hard to include all studies, I may have missed a few. Same for making sure all of the links work. So since this is a multiyear project, please ping me via e-mail if you see any issue. The e-mail that goes to my desk is [email protected]

The upshot? We see still see strong research publication in bone marrow stem cell use in orthopedics. Due to enough data being published on other stem cell types to warrant inclusion in my summary, I’ll pull the trigger on a bigger review that I’ll publish in tomorrow’s blog.

4/19/17—Added 2 papers by Mardones. 

10/1/17-Added our shoulder paper that I had initially neglected to include. 

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications. View Profile

If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]

NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

By submitting the form you agree that you’ve read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may use email, phone, or other electronic means to communicate information about Regenexx.

We will provide information to help you decide whether you want to schedule an evaluation with a Regenexx Physician.

Insurance typically covers evaluations and diagnostic testing (if recommended). Most insurance plans currently do not cover Regenexx Procedures.

Category: Latest News
Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved.

CONTACT INFORMATION

Address

9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021

Phone

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email
TO TOP