A New Way Clinic Stem Cell Review

By Chris Centeno, MD /

Receive a Regenexx® Patient Info Packet by email and learn why it's a superior regenerative solution.

a new way clinic portland review

I get contacted all the time with interesting stuff and this morning I woke up to a flyer from an acupuncture clinic in Portland, Oregon called “A New Way Clinic”. I’d like to review the accuracy of what was claimed in seminars about the “stem cell” procedures being offered and the flyer. So let’s dig in.

Stem Cell Seminars

The idea of giving a seminar to educate patients is fine. Hospitals do it all the time to advertise their new joint replacement programs. However, the problem begins when the information provided is demonstrably false or misrepresented.

The person who sent me the information attended a seminar put on by Tal Cohen, an acupuncturist from “A New Way Clinic” in Portland, Oregon. This is what was reported to me as relayed during the seminar:

  • 400,000 stem cells per 1 cc when using an amniotic source (lower cost product for younger patients)
  • 4-12 million stem cells when using from the umbilical cord.
  • These stem cells stay in your body for 2-5 years.

So let’s review those statements and then we’ll take a look at a flyer from the clinic that was sent to me.

Stem Cell Numbers?

First, let’s dig into the idea that amniotic fluid (the stuff that surrounds the baby in the womb) has 400,000 stem cell per ml as sold and as available to Tal Cohen’s “A New Way Clinic”. While amniotic fluid has a few stem cells when it’s fresh and cultured right away in a lab (1), multiple research studies have now demonstrated that commercially available amniotic fluid has no live and functional stem cells after it’s harvested, processed and manufactured, frozen, and sold by commercial vendors to clinics (2-4). Hence this claim that the amniotic fluid that the clinic uses has live stem cells is false. 

Next, the person that attended the seminar found out that they use an umbilical cord product manufactured by Utah Cord Bank. So does it have 4-12 million stem cells per vial? We tested this by plating the StemVive product obtained from Utah Cord Bank, it was all dead tissue with no living cells, let alone living stem cells. In fact, the product had very poor initial viability and this only got worse over 24 hours in culture. By that time it was all dead. We then had Colorado State University confirm our tests which also showed all dead cells. So the assertion that the umbilical cord product used by Tal Cohen and “A New Way Clinic” has millions of live and functional stem cells is false. Obviously, if the cells are dead, they will be quickly eliminated by your body as foreign tissue, so they won’t stay in your body for 2-5 years.

The Brochure

This is the top of the brochure:

tal cohen portland stem cells

OK, so now I’m expecting “The Truth”. Let’s check that! We see this next:

A new way clinic stem cells

This is an MRI that looks like it was taken from some publication in 2017. I did find the paper which is here. The problem? The cells used were not those from Utah Cord Bank, but a cell product that was cultured and manufactured and that is not available for use in the US or any other country at this time. Hence, what’s shown is NOT what happens with the product being used by this clinic. Next up:

First, tissue manufacturers are not “approved and certified”, they instead go through a free 45-minute registration online. The FDA can inspect the facility at any time, but issues no approvals nor certifications, only warnings if they find problems with sterility or processes. In addition, reporting and tracking “side effects” are not part of this type of FDA 361 tissue registration. For example, what’s being alluded to here is the type of published side effect profiles that are available for FDA approved drugs that the agency reviews and approves. Again, no such approval was granted here, just a simple 45-minute online registration.

This is a ProPublica story on the Utah Cord Bank. From that article:

“Industry insiders and the two former employees said that one placenta should yield between two and four hundred vials of amniotic stem cells. The Utah Cord Bank would harvest as many as eight hundred, the ex-employees said. Also according to the former employees, it costs less than fifty dollars to make a single vial, which is then sold to a clinic or a distributor for about a thousand dollars.

Spencer also used expired chemicals and reagents in his lab, according to two former employees. In January, 2018, the F.D.A. sent an inspector to the Utah Cord Bank to audit it for compliance with regulations on laboratory operations, according to the FDAzilla database, which tracks inspections. After the inspector notified the company that she would arrive on a Monday, workers spent the previous weekend getting rid of expired materials, two former employees said. In a statement to The New Yorker, Spencer denied ever using expired chemicals or reagents in his lab. The bank passed the audit.”

The upshot? So are the statements made by Mr. Cohen at the seminar and those in the brochure accurate? Not based on what’s been published or presented at medical conferences. In addition, the brochure (and the website which I didn’t review here) is rife with scientific citations that have little to do with the type of umbilical cord product that this clinic uses. Finally, the regulatory statements made in the brochure are also not accurate.

______________________________________________

References:

(1) Srivastava, M., Ahlawat, N. & Srivastava, A. Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells: A New Era in Regenerative Medicine. J Obstet Gynecol India (2018) 68: 15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1034-z

(2) Dustin R. Berger, Nicolette F. Lyons, and Neven J. Steinmetz. In Vitro Evaluation of Injectable, Placental Tissue-Derived Products for Interventional Orthopedics. Interventional Orthopedics Foundation Annual Meeting. Denver, 2015. https://interventionalorthopedics.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/AmnioProducts-Poster.pdf

(3) Liliya Becktell, Andrea Matuska, PhD, Stephanie Hon, DVM, Michelle L. Delco, DVM, PhD, Brian J. Cole, MD, Lisa A. Fortier, DVM, PhD. Proteomic analysis and cell viability of nine amnion-derived biologics. Orthopedic Research Society Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 2018. https://app.box.com/s/vcx7uw17gupg9ki06i57lno1tbjmzwaf

(4) Panero, A. J., Hirahara, A. M., Andersen, W. J., Rothenberg, J., & Fierro, F. (2019). Are Amniotic Fluid Products Stem Cell Therapies? A Study of Amniotic Fluid Preparations for Mesenchymal Stem Cells With Bone Marrow Comparison. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(5), 1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519829034

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

3 thoughts on “A New Way Clinic Stem Cell Review

  1. chris

    When at my dermatologist this week – she indicated that she was going to give her husband stem cells for hair growth to see the results before implementing. When I asked how she was deriving the cells, she indicated they were Umbilical “stem cells”. Is there a good document I can share with her with information on the lack of cells in these products, as I believe she would not knowingly tell patients she was giving stem cells when there may not be any in the product she is buying from one of these companies that advertises and sells that they have lots of cells in the product.

    1. Regenexx Team

      Hi chris,
      PRP is often used to encourage hair growth. Here is some information on Umbilical “stem cells”: https://regenexx.com/blog/a-regulators-guide-to-taking-down-the-stem-cell-wild-west/ and https://regenexx.com/blog/are-amniotic-and-umbilical-cord-treatments-fda-approved/

  2. Chris

    Thank you!

Chris Centeno, MD

Regenexx Founder

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications.
View Profile

Get Blog Updates by Email

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Regenerative procedures are commonly used to treat musculoskelatal trauma, overuse injuries, and degenerative issues, including failed surgeries.
Select Your Problem Area
Shoulder

Shoulder

Many Shoulder and Rotator Cuff injuries are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering shoulder arthroscopy or shoulder replacement, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.

  • Rotator Cuff Tears and Tendinitis
  • Shoulder Instability
  • SLAP Tear / Labral Tears
  • Shoulder Arthritis
  • Other Degenerative Conditions & Overuse Injuries
Learn More
Cervical Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Knee

Knees

Knees are the target of many common sports injuries. Sadly, they are also the target of a number of surgeries that research has frequently shown to be ineffective or minimally effective. Knee arthritis can also be a common cause for aging athletes to abandon the sports and activities they love. Regenerative procedures can be used to treat a wide range of knee injuries and conditions. They can even be used to reduce pain and delay knee replacement for more severe arthritis.

  • Knee Meniscus Tears
  • Knee ACL Tears
  • Knee Instability
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Other Knee Ligaments / Tendons & Overuse Injuries
  • And more
Learn More
Lower Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Hand & Wrist

Hand & Wrist

Hand and wrist injuries and arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and conditions relating to overuse of the thumb, are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Hand and Wrist Arthritis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Trigger Finger
  • Thumb Arthritis (Basal Joint, CMC, Gamer’s Thumb, Texting Thumb)
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More
Elbow

Elbow

Most injuries of the elbow’s tendons and ligaments, as well as arthritis, can be treated non-surgically with regenerative procedures.

  • Golfer’s elbow & Tennis elbow
  • Arthritis
  • Ulnar collateral ligament wear (common in baseball pitchers)
  • And more
Learn More
Hip

Hip

Hip injuries and degenerative conditions become more common with age. Do to the nature of the joint, it’s not quite as easy to injure as a knee, but it can take a beating and pain often develops over time. Whether a hip condition is acute or degenerative, regenerative procedures can help reduce pain and may help heal injured tissue, without the complications of invasive surgical hip procedures.

  • Labral Tear
  • Hip Arthritis
  • Hip Bursitis
  • Hip Sprain, Tendonitis or Inflammation
  • Hip Instability
Learn More
Foot & Ankle

Foot & Ankle

Foot and ankle injuries are common in athletes. These injuries can often benefit from non-surgical regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Ankle Arthritis
  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Ligament sprains or tears
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2019. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.