Radiofrequency Back Pain Treatment Reviews: Is This a Good Idea?

By /

Radiofrequency has recently resurfaced in the medical news, but are there any reliable Radiofrequency Back Pain Treatment reviews?  Many years ago, I learned how to use radiofrequency ablation (RFA). The good news is that, for the first time, I could treat patients with chronic neck pain and they would get better for one to two years from a single treatment. The bad news is that I knew I was destroying tissue to do it and that this would eventually come back to haunt the patient. Now a new low-back-disc RFA device has just received FDA approval, and that’s a problem as my patients will now be getting the same destructive procedure believing that this is helping their disc, when in fact the opposite is likely occurring.

What Is RFA?

Medical infographic showing Radiofrequency ablation needles treating nerves in the spine


Radiofrequency ablation isn’t new—in fact it’s been performed for many years in pain management. Basically, it uses energy in the radiofrequency spectrum to heat tissue and ablate (read “destroy”) tissue. This is one of those times in medicine when if we doctors named these devices for what they did, you as a patient would never sign up. For example, who wants to be treated with a “radiofrequency destruction device.” So to fix that problem, we substituted another, more obtuse, word like “ablation.” Most patients aren’t quite sure what that means, and even if they do know what it means, it sounds oh so much more elegant than “destroy.”

Learn about Regenexx procedures for spine conditions.

The Upsides and Downsides of RFA

When I first learned how to use RFA to treat chronic neck pain due to damaged facet joints in the neck, it was a pretty neat tool to have. I could treat my patients’ neck pain once and they would get one to two years of relief. Of course the pain would come back with a vengeance, and they would need another treatment, but at the time, this was pretty revolutionary.

The downside of RFA is that we’re destroying tissue. In the case of the neck, that tissue is the little nerve that takes pain signals from the joint. We know from other areas of medicine that when you take away a nerve supply to a joint, bad things happen. Eventually, since the patient can’t feel the area and continues to place forces on the damaged area, the pace of arthritis of that joint quickens. This is called a Charcot joint.

What’s fascinating in RFA is that, at least in the neck, I still can’t find a single study where someone has looked at this issue long-term (i.e., what happens to the neck joints of long-term-treated RFA patients). Maybe we as pain-medicine doctors just don’t want to know. I can tell you that in my own patient population, I saw these joints get worse over time, but that’s just my observation. Given that almost all of our chronic spine patients who were getting RFA have now been switched to platelet or stem-cell-based treatments, it’s a question I’ll never be able to definitively answer.

Radiofrequency Back Pain Treatment Reviews: RFA of the Low-Back Disc?

I recently read a press release about a new low-back-disc-pain RFA treatment. The orthopedic surgeon who participated in the study had glowing reviews of the technology, and a few patient successes were highlighted. The procedure received FDA approval, and as a result, I’m sure that I’ll begin seeing patients now at my clinic who have had the procedure.

The problem with Radiofrequency for low-back discs is of course the same problem as the one I describe above—destroying the nerves in the disc is no safer in the long run than destroying the nerves that take pain from the neck or back joints. Those nerves serve a purpose. In the case of a painful disc, they help get weight and forces off the disc until it can heal. So should we be nuking those nerves and likely causing faster degeneration of the disc, or should we be using treatments that might help the disc, like platelets and stem cells? You already know which one I’m going to offer my patients.

The upshot? Radiofrequency Back Pain Treatment reviews are not good. RFA was a great technology for its time that helped patients in the short run and likely hurt them in the long run. However, with all of the new platelet and stem-cell-based options for the spine, it seems like this new RFA disc treatment has arrived very late to the party. No thanks for me. I’ve stopped nuking important nerves in my patients to buy them some relief—gave it up for good!

Join us for a free Regenexx Cervical Spine Webinar
Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications. View Profile

If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]

NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved.



9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021


*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.