When Naturopaths Try to Silence Public Discourse : The Harry Adelson Chronicles

By Chris Centeno, MD /

Receive a Regenexx® Patient Info Packet by email and learn why it's a superior regenerative solution.

harry adelson stem cells

I have been a big critic of naturopaths offering investigational stem cell procedures. In my opinion, one of the naturopaths who has pushed his practice act to its limits and beyond is Harry Adelson. I was recently sued by Harry for questioning whether his practice act authorized what he’s doing. Now that the suit is done, I can write about it.

My Overall Experience with Naturopaths

My wife and some of my kids have food allergies. In particular, I’m very thankful to our local naturopath who helped my wife figure this all out. So I have no issue with the idea of naturopaths.

Naturopaths and Stem Cells

Naturopaths are just one provider type in a list that includes medical doctors, chiropractors, and acupuncturists who are misleading the public by offering stem cell therapies with no stem cells or procedures that are less than technically competent. However, naturopaths have specific practice restrictions based on far less medical training compared to physicians. What’s fascinating about all of this is having reviewed all existing state naturopathic practice acts, almost all clearly don’t permit many of the procedures that are being performed out there. Which is how Harry Adelson ended up suing me. Let me explain.

The Utah Naturopathic Act and Adelson

Many years ago it came on my radar that Harry Adelson was offering a full suite of x-ray guided interventional spine procedures including the injection of low back discs. The problem? His Utah naturopathic practice act, in my opinion, doesn’t authorize spinal injection procedures. Here’s what it says:

(7) (a) “Minor office procedures” means:
(i) the use of operative, electrical, or other methods for repair and care of superficial lacerations,
abrasions, and benign lesions;
(ii) removal of foreign bodies located in the superficial tissues, excluding the eye or ear;
(iii) the use of antiseptics and local anesthetics in connection with minor office surgical
procedures; and
(iv) if approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration, percutaneous injection into
skin, tendons, ligaments, muscles, and joints with:
(A) local anesthetics and nonscheduled prescription medications; and
(B) natural substances.
(b) “Minor office procedures” does not include:
(i) general or spinal anesthesia;
(ii) office procedures more complicated or extensive than those set forth in Subsection (7)(a);
(iii) procedures involving the eye; and
(iv) any office procedure involving tendons, nerves, veins, or arteries

Note that all Harry is permitted to do is to perform, based on what’s written here, are minor office procedures. Injecting stem cells into a disc using x-ray guidance is NOT a minor office procedure. In particular, the Utah naturopathic practice act states that Harry can’t inject the spine (i.e. no “spinal anesthesia”).

Getting Sued

After one of my blogs, I got a letter from Adelson’s attorney that requested that I take down my blog and issue an apology. Before I could even digest the letter, I was met with a lawsuit a few days later. These are called SLAPP suits which stands for Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation. Given that my critiques of Harry have been about his injection techniques (which in my opinion are not up to our standards) and the fact that in my opinion, the state of Utah doesn’t permit him to perform interventional spine procedures using stem cells and that all of that is well within my first amendment rights, I didn’t back down and hired a Utah attorney who is an expert in first amendment law. The outcome? The judge threw Harry’s case out (with prejudice) at the preliminary summary judgment phase, meaning he felt that Harry had no chance of winning his case at trial. Why? My opinions that Harry was violating his practice act are protected free speech.

When Naturopaths Stifle Public Discourse

An interesting feature of Harry’s lawsuit was that there is a legitimate public discourse to be had around which procedures are appropriate for naturopaths to perform. However, Harry’s lawsuit has had the effect of stifling that discourse for the past 6-months. Meaning while we were being sued, whether Harry’s or any other naturopathic practice act actually authorized performing spinal or stem cell procedures wasn’t featured here. It looks like I’m not the only health provider to be sued by a naturopath as Britt Hermes, a long-time critic of naturopathy (who was herself a naturopath), has also been sued and had the case thrown out.

A Consensus Statement

A consensus statement on the issue of naturopaths and other alternative medicine providers performing investigational care and stem cell procedures was recently produced. Twenty key opinion leaders in orthobiologics, orthopedics, and interventional spine signed the document. Which begs the question for those physicians involved in courses where naturopaths and other alternative health practitioners are educated on how to perform stem cell and orthobiologic procedures, should you be doing this? Meaning, is it ethical for a physician to train providers whose practice acts don’t authorize the procedure being taught?

Harry’s Statements

I reached out to Harry Adelson for comments and his point of view, but at the time of this writing I hadn’t heard back. If he does respond, I will update the blog.

Threatening Letters

I have become a watchdog of sorts for the regen medicine industry, trying hard to separate legitimate, science-based, medical care from claims that don’t add up or make scientific sense. As a result, I’ve gotten my share of letters threatening lawsuits. However, I have no problem defending what I write. From a bigger picture standpoint, you would think that scenarios like this one would silence me from calling out the crazy parts of the stem cell wild west. In fact, they have the opposite effect, making it clear to me that I’m doing the right thing.

The upshot? Should naturopaths be performing complex spinal procedures using stem cells? Not in my opinion. Let me know what you think.

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

6 thoughts on “When Naturopaths Try to Silence Public Discourse : The Harry Adelson Chronicles

  1. Tonya

    You are doing the right thing, Dr. Centeno! Armed with the expert knowledge in your own field, you also have the passion, courage and conviction to call out those who are deliberately harming others for a profit. People are not always aware of medical battery and products that are being sold to trusting patients as something other than what they are, such as what happened with our family being sold in very perceptive based and persuasive sales language what they called “living stem cells from a live, healthy birth that were sterilized and screened, “ all of which turned out to be false! Not contacting any living stem cells turns out to be the least significant concern as the products are labeled “ for research use only” and are being sold as if they are 351 FDA Approved drugs. The product used on our family was recalled and nearly killed one of our family members and leaving another with disease(s) listed on the FLORIDA Department of Health’s letter about those injected needing to be tested from at least 8 communicable diseases from West Nile ( where is this product actually coming from) to HIV and Cytomegalovirus. In retaliation to our Pro Se suit and doing a few segments on national television, we were served with a SLAPP from the selling/ injecting physicians from another state where no one of this happened and where neither physician lives, one listing his address as a mortuary! Thanks to you, Dr. Centeno, we learned that we had been scammed by this “ Amniotic and Cord Blood Sales Pitch.” We continue to follow and learn from your blog and sincerely appreciate you and your valiant efforts to educate, inform and speak to people who might not otherwise understand any of this persuasively engineered pseudoscience sales craft cleverly integrated and designed to be passed off and sold to the public as something that it clearly isn’t and is in direct violation of the Codes of Federal Regulation, Public Health Safety Act, CBER, FDA, CDC and more importantly, causing great and irreversible harm to individuals.

  2. JUNE HUCHINGSON

    I, DEFINITELY, TRUST DR. CENTENO. I REALLY APPRECIATE HIS WRITINGS. HE HAS A GREAT ATTITUDE.
    IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, HE HAS THE MOST EXPERIENCE AND HE IS INTERESTED IN CONSTANTLY RESEARCHING.

    ON THE OTHERHAND, SOMETIMES, MAVERICKS WILL OPEN A DOOR TO EXPLORING “NEW WAYS” OF DOING THINGS.

    (I, PERSONALLY, DO NOT TRUST THE FDA BECAUSE OF THEIR TIES TO PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.)

    I DO FEEL CONCERN WHEN PEOPLE (ESPECIALLY CHILDREN) ARE USED TO TEST A PRODUCT … AND, ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE IS A DANGEROUS RESULT. (AND WE KNOW THAT HAS HAPPENED OVER THE YEARS FROM FDA APPROVED MEDICINE.)

    TO ME, THE IDEAL WOULD BE FOR ALL TYPES OF HEALERS TO GET TOGETHER AND BE OPEN-MINDED, AND SHARE THEIR EXPERIENCES (SUCCESSES AND FAILURES). OF COURSE, ONLY BRAVE AND ALTRUISTIC HEALERS WOULD DO THIS.

    ULTIMATELY, THIS SHOULD HELP ALL PATIENTS … AND HEALERS.

  3. Edith(Edy)Johnson

    I agree with your stance.

  4. Shane Bengoechea

    I represent many providers in audits my insurers and Medicare and disciplinary matters. Over the years I have found certain provider types which I am sure you are familiar with as you have mentioned in your blog go beyond their scope of practice. They represent they can cure and fix all types of ailments. Some get in trouble with the licensing board for not stating their so called medical clinic is rendering services from a provider who is not an M.D. and allude it is a medical practice. These types of representations are misleading and one such provider has done this on several occasions and is in trouble again with the licensing board after I counseled him not to engage in such misleading activity. Some of these provider types believe they have the same degree of skill as an M.D. If they wanted to be a M.D. they should have attended medical school and not the other disciplines.

  5. Laurie Tsitsivas

    I wonder how these kinds of issues will be handled with Medicare for all. Insurance doesn’t cover PRP, which is not fair. How will the problem of paying for these treatments, as well as all these issues you discuss here be dealt with?

    1. Regenexx Team

      Laurie,
      Approximately 7 million people currently have coverage for Regenexx procedures. Please see: https://regenexx.com/blog/stem-cell-procedure-insurance-coverage/ They are not currently covered by Medicare, and are not currently covered in countries with National Health programs.

Chris Centeno, MD

Regenexx Founder

Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications.
View Profile

Get Blog Updates by Email

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Regenerative procedures are commonly used to treat musculoskelatal trauma, overuse injuries, and degenerative issues, including failed surgeries.
Select Your Problem Area
Shoulder

Shoulder

Many Shoulder and Rotator Cuff injuries are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering shoulder arthroscopy or shoulder replacement, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.

  • Rotator Cuff Tears and Tendinitis
  • Shoulder Instability
  • SLAP Tear / Labral Tears
  • Shoulder Arthritis
  • Other Degenerative Conditions & Overuse Injuries
Learn More
Cervical Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Knee

Knees

Knees are the target of many common sports injuries. Sadly, they are also the target of a number of surgeries that research has frequently shown to be ineffective or minimally effective. Knee arthritis can also be a common cause for aging athletes to abandon the sports and activities they love. Regenerative procedures can be used to treat a wide range of knee injuries and conditions. They can even be used to reduce pain and delay knee replacement for more severe arthritis.

  • Knee Meniscus Tears
  • Knee ACL Tears
  • Knee Instability
  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Other Knee Ligaments / Tendons & Overuse Injuries
  • And more
Learn More
Lower Spine

Spine

Many spine injuries and degenerative conditions are good candidates for regenerative treatments and there are a number of studies showing promising results in treating a wide range of spine problems. Spine surgery should be a last resort for anyone, due to the cascade of negative effects it can have on the areas surrounding the surgery. And epidural steroid injections are problematic due to their long-term negative impact on bone density.

  • Herniated, Bulging, Protruding Discs
  • Degenerative Disc Disease
  • SI Joint Syndrome
  • Sciatica
  • Pinched Nerves and General Back Pain
  • And more
Learn More
Hand & Wrist

Hand & Wrist

Hand and wrist injuries and arthritis, carpal tunnel syndrome, and conditions relating to overuse of the thumb, are good candidates for regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Hand and Wrist Arthritis
  • Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
  • Trigger Finger
  • Thumb Arthritis (Basal Joint, CMC, Gamer’s Thumb, Texting Thumb)
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More
Elbow

Elbow

Most injuries of the elbow’s tendons and ligaments, as well as arthritis, can be treated non-surgically with regenerative procedures.

  • Golfer’s elbow & Tennis elbow
  • Arthritis
  • Ulnar collateral ligament wear (common in baseball pitchers)
  • And more
Learn More
Hip

Hip

Hip injuries and degenerative conditions become more common with age. Do to the nature of the joint, it’s not quite as easy to injure as a knee, but it can take a beating and pain often develops over time. Whether a hip condition is acute or degenerative, regenerative procedures can help reduce pain and may help heal injured tissue, without the complications of invasive surgical hip procedures.

  • Labral Tear
  • Hip Arthritis
  • Hip Bursitis
  • Hip Sprain, Tendonitis or Inflammation
  • Hip Instability
Learn More
Foot & Ankle

Foot & Ankle

Foot and ankle injuries are common in athletes. These injuries can often benefit from non-surgical regenerative treatments. Before considering surgery, consider an evaluation of your condition with a regenerative treatment specialist.
  • Ankle Arthritis
  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Ligament sprains or tears
  • Other conditions that cause pain
Learn More

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2019. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email