Class Action Against Stem Cell Clinic Using Fictional Outcomes Can Proceed

By /

stemgenex class action

I’ve been warning for years that clinics that are using stem cells to treat any medical condition should be collecting clinical outcome data and making that public. This week a stem cell clinic in California overpromising and under delivering became a cautionary tale for all rogue clinics as a judge allowed a patient class action to be certified. Let’s dig in on why this is helpful for cleaning up the stem cell wild west.

Collecting Outcome Data

Collecting outcome data just means that the clinic uses validated tools like questionnaires to access how a patient fared with their treatment. For example, if treating the knee, the patient would get questioned about the level of their pain or their ability to do things like walk long distances or climb stairs. All of this is compared to their responses before the treatment to determine if progress has been made.

This data collection is usually accomplished by using a treatment registry. This is where all consented patients are sent these questionnaires on a regular basis and any information on complications is also collected. In principle, this sounds simple, but few doctors using regenerative medicine or orthobiologics actually collect any clinical data.

Why don’t clinics collect much data? It’s hard to do. It takes time and money to create a registry and then, more importantly, it takes a huge commitment by the clinic to make sure that patients are answering these questionnaires. In fact, it’s this last part where it all usually falls apart.

As an example, early on in our use of orthobiologics, an orthopedic surgeon in Florida actually stole some of the data we had published online about the outcome of using our specialized bone marrow concentrate protocol to treat knee arthritis. I confronted him as he was using a very different procedure. He then took our data off his website and placed a made up number there instead, stating that 80% of his patients had success. Later, it came to my attention that he had published some of his own data, but that data didn’t look quite right. So when I hunted that down through the person he had hired to collect it, I found out that some of it had been made up as well. Basically, his clinic forgot to give patients the pre-treatment questionnaire, so he had made up pre-treatment pain numbers for patients. Which just goes to show you, collecting data, even when a clinic tries to, is hard.

The StemGenex Case

I’ve blogged on this California clinic before. Basically, they were claiming sky-high success rates with their fat based stem cell procedure used to treat all sorts of serious diseases. However, that wasn’t actual patient outcome data, but patient satisfaction data on how the patient’s perceived the service they received. However, many patients believed that this customer satisfaction survey information was clinical data. Some patients sued and sought a class action status, which was granted by the judge this past week.

What Patients and Clinics Can Learn from this Class Action Case

I see stem cell treatment websites pop up every day making claims about success rates. The problem is that like our Florida orthopedic surgeon, most of it is spitballed and not based on collecting and analyzing outcome questionnaires from many treated patients. Hence, all of these clinics are open to this type of class action suit. They also fail to meet the minimum standards for advertising set out by the FTC, which requires clinics to justify what they claim with actual data. This risk was made evident by an FTC lawsuit recently brought against an Oregon clinic. In addition, some clinics may have state attorney generals to contend with, as both North Dakota and New York State AGs have filed suits against clinics over similar concerns.

What to Do or Look For…

As a clinic, if you report outcomes on your website, you MUST have real data to back that up. As a patient, you should be looking for real data as well. How can you tell if the data is real? Here are some tips:

  • Look for outcome information on their website. Most clinics have none. If nothing is listed, then this speaks for itself.
  • Round numbers are not good. While there’s a 1 in 10 chance that patients might report 80% improvement, there’s a 9 in 10 chance that this is a made up number.
  • Look for actual data collected in a registry that is updated regularly and available online for you to review.
  • Look for publications in scientific journals that are authored by that clinic or network of clinics. Be careful with this one, as clinics will often list research studies that have nothing to do with the procedures or protocols they offer.

Aren’t All Stem Cell Procedures the Same?

You might be tempted to think that since many clinics use the same “stem cell” term to describe what they do, you can use one clinic’s data and apply it to another. Regrettably, the number of different types of stem cells and protocols being used is vast, hence it’s very unlikely that one clinic’s data applies to the next.

What We Do at Regenexx

Regenexx has the world’s largest treatment registry in orthobiologics as we have been collecting data since 2005. There isn’t even a close second. Here’s what we have:

The upshot? The StemGenex case is just the tip of the iceberg. Expect to see more lawsuits and enforcement actions by FTC and state Attorney Generals on clinics that spitball their outcomes rather than collecting and reporting real clinical information. In the meantime, if you’re a patient, use my tips above to stay away from the stem cell scams out there.

Get health and wellness information from a trusted source.

By submitting the form, you are agreeing that you read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may also contact you via email, phone, and other electronic means to communicate information about our products and services. We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

Category: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

7 thoughts on “Class Action Against Stem Cell Clinic Using Fictional Outcomes Can Proceed

  1. With Held

    Just looking at the COST should tell most people EVERYONE is not able to have success. I went thru 5 injection sessions. All I got was pain!

  2. Carol E Swick

    Best factual information should be x-ray evidence of new cell growth after 6 months. I had my right knee done after I had no cartilage left. We could see on x-rays the new growth between bones.

  3. Roger Langille

    ‘Rogue’ clinics, too. ;)

    1. Regenexx Marketing

      We just fixed it. Thanks 😉

  4. David Giles

    Outstanding investigation
    Who is the best for stem cell for COPD

    1. Regenexx Team

      Hi David,
      There is a lot of research going on, and a few actual Clinical trials going on, but it’s an area in which you need to be incredibly careful. https://regenexx.com/blog/fake-clinical-trials-in-the-stem-cell-wild-west/

Is Regenexx Right For You?

Request a free Regenexx Info Packet

REGENEXX WEBINARS

Learn about the #1 Stem Cell & Platelet Procedures for treating arthritis, common joint injuries & spine pain.

Join a Webinar

RECEIVE BLOG ARTICLES BY EMAIL

Get fresh updates and insights from Regenexx delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to the Blog

CONTACT US

9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021
888-525-3005

FOLLOW US

Copyright © Regenexx 2020. All rights reserved. | Privacy Policy

*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.

LinkedIn
Email