The Orthopedic Structural Paradigm is Dead…

By /

orthopedic structural paradigm

We have a serious problem in orthopedic care that is negatively impacting patient health on a daily basis. It likely causes more morbidity than operative infections and hospital errors combined. What is it? While the research continues to argue that the structure we see on MRIs is relatively unimportant in explaining why patients have pain, the entire surgical orthopedic system is focused on fixing that structure-often hurting more patients than are being helped.

First, what do I mean by a structural model? Take for example a meniscus tear. We’ve educated patients to believe that seeing a meniscus tear on an MRI is a very important finding that explains why their knee hurts. In fact, this messaging is so prevalent that this past week I’ve had my own brother, a dentist, and a patient all call me convinced that the reason why their knee hurts is a meniscus tear that was seen on MRI. Each had seen an orthopedic surgeon who further supported that belief. Despite this, each was a middle aged guy and the largest study to date on the topic shows that these men are just as likely to have meniscus tears on their MRIs without any knee pain! Given that research, how could we conclude that the mensicus tear seen after the knee began hurting was the cause of their pain? We can’t. In fact, basing a surgical procedure to cut out the offending tear and exposing these patients to that risk is a really bad idea. How well do these meniscus surgeries work based on the existing research? They don’t work. Hence, are we at that point that if a middle aged patient has a meniscus tear on MRI and the knee hurts, the surgery will no longer be covered by insurance? If we’re not there yet, when?

The orthopedic structural model is failing all over the place in the research literature. Here’s just a short list:

1. The research doesn’t clearly show that ACL surgery for a torn ligament is any better than no surgery.

2. There isn’t convincing evidence that a rotator cuff tear is better off with surgery than without.

3. The long-term effects of knee micro fracture surgery for a hole in the cartilage are pretty bad.

4. A startling number of patients who have hip and knee replacements for arthritis still have significant hip and knee pain.

5. Many patients who don’t have hip pain can be diagnosed with some form of impingement, while hip labrum surgery for patients with hip pain is hailed as a break through procedure. Despite the hype, we have very little good evidence that these surgeries help patients versus doing nothing.

5. Few orthopedic procedures have high levels of evidence that they’re effective.

The upshot? Patients walk into a doctor’s office because of pain or lost function. Our existing orthopedic structural paradigm – i.e. something is broken and we need to fix it surgically, is pretty poor based on the existing research and every year more of it falls apart at the seams. Why is this model failing? While structure may be important in some cases, the reason why patients hurt is often much more complex than seeing a little spot on an MRI. It involves nerves, chemicals, and biomechanics-things that the structural model of pain fails to account for-hence the poor results. So what will the next 20 years bring? I expect that orthopedics will get an overhaul similar to the one we saw in the 80’s when arthroscopy came into widespread use. As I’ve said before, for most procedures, needles and biologics will replace scopes and scalpels.

Join us for a free Regenexx webinar.
Chris Centeno, MD is a specialist in regenerative medicine and the new field of Interventional Orthopedics. Centeno pioneered orthopedic stem cell procedures in 2005 and is responsible for a large amount of the published research on stem cell use for orthopedic applications. View Profile

If you have questions or comments about this blog post, please email us at [email protected]

NOTE: This blog post provides general information to help the reader better understand regenerative medicine, musculoskeletal health, and related subjects. All content provided in this blog, website, or any linked materials, including text, graphics, images, patient profiles, outcomes, and information, are not intended and should not be considered or used as a substitute for medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please always consult with a professional and certified healthcare provider to discuss if a treatment is right for you.

Get Blog Updates by Email

We do not sell, or share your information to third party vendors.

By submitting the form you agree that you’ve read and consent to our Privacy Policy. We may use email, phone, or other electronic means to communicate information about Regenexx.

We will provide information to help you decide whether you want to schedule an evaluation with a Regenexx Physician.

Insurance typically covers evaluations and diagnostic testing (if recommended). Most insurance plans currently do not cover Regenexx Procedures.

Category: Latest News
Copyright © Regenexx 2021. All rights reserved.



9035 Wadsworth Pkwy #1000
Westminster, CO 80021


*DISCLAIMER: Like all medical procedures, Regenexx® Procedures have a success and failure rate. Patient reviews and testimonials on this site should not be interpreted as a statement on the effectiveness of our treatments for anyone else.

Providers listed on the Regenexx website are for informational purposes only and are not a recommendation from Regenexx for a specific provider or a guarantee of the outcome of any treatment you receive.